The differences between forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology.
نویسنده
چکیده
Forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology face a common threat: the erosion of their credibility. It is proposed that they can combat this threat better by collaboration than by independent efforts. Similarities between the two professions are reviewed to examine their potential for collaboration. Their differences are reviewed to demonstrate the value of that which they can contribute collaboratively, beyond that which either can contribute independently, to increasing their credibility in the eyes of the public and the courts. Three specific areas for collaboration are proposed: individual practice, quality control of expert testimony, and training.
منابع مشابه
Collaboration: The Paradigm of Practice Approach between the Forensic Psychiatrist and the Forensic Psychologist
The importance and relevance of forensic practice to societal evolution has increased exponentially in recent years. As society evolves in its understanding of the complex relationships between mankind and society, we rely more and more on the services of forensic experts. This article elucidates the professions of forensic psychiatry and forensic psychology. We examine the two distinct profess...
متن کاملCommentary: observations and concerns on the bigendering of our forensic fields.
The study by Neal et al. of mock jurors in the penalty phase of a homicide case led me to observations on gender changes over the past few decades in the professions of law and forensic psychiatry and psychology. From an earlier paucity of women in these professions, today their percentages have greatly increased. Yet, as in this study, there are differences that work to the advantage of men in...
متن کاملCountering countertransference, II: beyond evaluation to cross-examination.
Countertransference is a clinical term introduced by Freud in 1909. For years, despite mounting criticism, forensic psychiatrists borrowed this clinical concept to explain their emotional experiences and responses to examinees' emotions and behavior. The authors describe the impact of examinee and nonexaminee factors during evaluations and beyond, including during trial and while providing fore...
متن کاملDifferences in Demographic and Psychological Variables in Suicide by Self-immolation and Poisoning
Background: Self-immolation and intentional poisoning are two common methods for suicidal attempts in developing countries. Few studies have compared the characteristics of people who commit suicide by self-immolation or intentional poisoning. Hence, the aim of this study was to compare demographic, social, and psychological features between these two groups. Methods: In the present study, pat...
متن کاملClaims of crime-related amnesia in forensic patients.
M. Cima*, H. Nijman, H. Merckelbach, K. Kremer, S. Hollnack Assistant Professor, Department of Medical, Clinical and Experimental Psychology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands Senior researcher, Forensic Psychiatric Hospital De Kijvelanden, Poortugaal, The Netherlands Professor, Department of Experimental Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 21 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1993